Offensive - Isn't $28,000 at Panda Express better than $0 at home? - Anonymous
There are 5 comments for this story.
|
robin March 4, 2003 - 7:40pm | |
|
The dumb fuck in question happens to be the editor who published your story. JFYI. | |
|
yawetag March 4, 2003 - 11:00pm | |
|
The dumb fuck is also a female. JFYI | |
|
slac March 5, 2003 - 5:48am | |
|
Geez... Get a grip you bozo. 28 000 is better than 0.... ever heard of something called math? With an attitude like that, I can easily undertstand why your having so many problems. | |
|
lina March 5, 2003 - 5:54am | |
|
With your shitty attitude you get what you deserve *muahahahahaha* What goes around comes around. Have a nice life! LOL | |
|
ocelot <cat@ansible.org> March 5, 2003 - 5:46pm | |
|
I'll agree that cussing out the editor of the site and referring to someone with a distinctly female name as male is pretty darn stupid. However, if he thinks that, in his personal situation, it is better to have no job than one that pays $28,000, I'm not going to second guess his decision. It sounds like he has the experience to make this decision, and isn't just turning down the job because he's "above" it or something. Jobs that don't pay enough to get by are often worse than useless, since they can increase living expenses, reduce eligibility for federal aid programs, reduce the amount of time available for searching for a job that pays a living wage, etc. Just straight $28,000 > $0 doesn't cover it, and it sounds like he's done the math a whole lot better than you have. | |
You may post comments on this story by logging in with your username and password. If you don't have a username and a password, you should probably register first.